Alfa Romeo Brera
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6vsAlfa Romeo 4C 1.7
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 4C
1.7
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest895 kg1,973 lb
- Best power-to-weight268 hp/t200 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions157 g/km
- Best performance score67/100
- Best economy score89/100
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Best estimated range636 km395 mi
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | Alfa Romeo4C1.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 322Nm237lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 895kg1,973lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 97.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 52.1s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.5s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 268hp/t200kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 391Nm/t262lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 636km395mi Calculated | 588km366mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,195cc195cu in | 1,742cc106cu in |
| Length | 4,410mm174in | 3,989mm157in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,341mm53in | 1,183mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,528mm100in | 2,380mm94in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,639mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 114mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 110L |
| Max trunk volume | 610L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 260g/km | 157g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 6,300 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 | 6,000 rpm | 2,200-4,250 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | Alfa Romeo4C1.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.5 s | 15.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 184 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 | 895 kg 1,973 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 | 258 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 7.0 s |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 | 4.5 s |
Although Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 has more power, Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: 2.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 and Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6: 4.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 636 km 395 mi |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 | 588 km 366 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 | 240 hp 179 kW | 4.5 s | 258 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6 | Alfa Romeo4C1.7 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 895 kg 1,973 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 636 km 395 mi | 588 km 366 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 260 g/km | 157 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 | Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 48 km (30 mi) more estimated range
- Has 190 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7
- Has 28 Nm more
- Is 645 kg lighter
- Is 2.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 99 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 103 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























