Alfa Romeo 4C
1.7 (Stage 3)
360 hp1742 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2013-2016
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 · Stage 3vsAlfa Romeo 4C 1.7 · Stage 2vsAlfa Romeo 4C 1.7 · Stage 1vsAlfa Romeo 4C 1.7
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Alfa Romeo 4C
1.7 (Stage 2)
312 hp1742 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2013-2016
VS
Alfa Romeo 4C
1.7 (Stage 1)
283 hp1742 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2013-2016
VS
Alfa Romeo 4C
1.7
240 hp1742 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2013-2016
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 (Stage 3) 360 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Highest torque543 Nm400 lb-ft
- Lightest895 kg1,973 lb
- Best power-to-weight402 hp/t300 kW/t2.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions157 g/km
- Best estimated range588 km366 mi
- Largest trunk110 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | Alfa Romeo4C1.7240 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360hp268kW+120 hp | 312hp233kW+72 hp | 283hp211kW+43 hp | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 543Nm400lb-ft+193 Nm | 473Nm348lb-ft+123 Nm | 427Nm315lb-ft+77 Nm | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 895kg1,973lb | 895kg1,973lb | 895kg1,973lb | 895kg1,973lb |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | 286 km/h 178 mph | 277 km/h 172 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 42.7s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph-9.7 s Calculated | 46.7s99% target: 283 km/h / 176 mph-5.7 s Calculated | 49.3s99% target: 274 km/h / 170 mph-3.1 s Calculated | 52.4s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s-1.0 s | 3.8s-0.7 s | 4.1s-0.4 s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.8s-5.5 s Calculated | 11.3s-3.9 s Calculated | 12.5s-2.7 s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s-0.9 s Calculated | 3.7s-0.6 s Calculated | 3.9s-0.4 s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.1s-1.5 s Calculated | 11.6s-0.9 s Calculated | 12.0s-0.6 s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 402hp/t300kW/t182hp/1000 lb Calculated | 349hp/t260kW/t158hp/1000 lb Calculated | 316hp/t236kW/t144hp/1000 lb Calculated | 268hp/t200kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 606Nm/t406lb-ft/ton Calculated | 528Nm/t353lb-ft/ton Calculated | 477Nm/t319lb-ft/ton Calculated | 391Nm/t262lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 588km366mi Calculated | 588km366mi Calculated | 588km366mi Calculated | 588km366mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,742cc106cu in | 1,742cc106cu in | 1,742cc106cu in | 1,742cc106cu in |
| Length | 3,989mm157in | 3,989mm157in | 3,989mm157in | 3,989mm157in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,864mm73in | 1,864mm73in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,183mm47in | 1,183mm47in | 1,183mm47in | 1,183mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,380mm94in | 2,380mm94in | 2,380mm94in | 2,380mm94in |
| Front track | 1,639mm65in | 1,639mm65in | 1,639mm65in | 1,639mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,604mm63in | 1,604mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 114mm4in | 114mm4in | 114mm4in | 114mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 110L | 110L | 110L | 110L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 40L | 40L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 157g/km | 157g/km | 157g/km | 157g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 (Stage 3) 360 hpAlfa Romeo 4C 1.7 (Stage 2) 312 hpAlfa Romeo 4C 1.7 (Stage 1) 283 hpAlfa Romeo 4C 1.7 240 hpPowerTorque
- Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 (Stage 3) 360 hp: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 (Stage 2) 312 hp: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 (Stage 1) 283 hp: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 240 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 6,000 rpm | 2,200-4,250 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 6,000 rpm | 2,200-4,250 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 6,000 rpm | 2,200-4,250 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7240 hp | 6,000 rpm | 2,200-4,250 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | Alfa Romeo4C1.7240 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.7 s | 3.9 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 3.8 s | 4.1 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.8 s | 11.3 s | 12.5 s | 15.3 s |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | 286 km/h 178 mph | 277 km/h 172 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.2 s | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 7.7 s | 7.9 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.4 s | 9.8 s | 10.1 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.1 s | 11.6 s | 12.0 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 214 km/h 133 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 360 hp 268 kW |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 312 hp 233 kW |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 283 hp 211 kW |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7240 hp | 240 hp 179 kW |
Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 (Stage 3) 360 hp has 120 hp more than Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 240 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 240 hp and Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 (Stage 3) 360 hp: 120 hp (89 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 473 Nm 348 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7240 hp | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 895 kg 1,973 lb |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 895 kg 1,973 lb |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 895 kg 1,973 lb |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7240 hp | 895 kg 1,973 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 277 km/h 172 mph |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7240 hp | 258 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 3.5 s |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 3.8 s |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 4.1 s |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7240 hp | 4.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 (Stage 3) 360 hp and Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 240 hp: 1.0 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 (Stage 2) 312 hp and Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 (Stage 1) 283 hp, separated by only 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7240 hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 402 hp/t 300 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 349 hp/t 260 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 316 hp/t 236 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7240 hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 588 km 366 mi |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 588 km 366 mi |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 588 km 366 mi |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7240 hp | 588 km 366 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 360 hp 268 kW | 3.5 s | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 312 hp 233 kW | 3.8 s | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 283 hp 211 kW | 4.1 s | 277 km/h 172 mph |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7240 hp | 240 hp 179 kW | 4.5 s | 258 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7240 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7240 hp |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 (Stage 3) 360 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7240 hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | 402 hp/t 300 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | 349 hp/t 260 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | 316 hp/t 236 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo4C1.7240 hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 3)360 hp | Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 2)312 hp | Alfa Romeo4C1.7 (Stage 1)283 hp | Alfa Romeo4C1.7240 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp 268 kW | 312 hp 233 kW | 283 hp 211 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft | 473 Nm 348 lb-ft | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 3.8 s | 4.1 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | 286 km/h 178 mph | 277 km/h 172 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 895 kg 1,973 lb | 895 kg 1,973 lb | 895 kg 1,973 lb | 895 kg 1,973 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 588 km 366 mi | 588 km 366 mi | 588 km 366 mi | 588 km 366 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 157 g/km | 157 g/km | 157 g/km | 157 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 402 hp/t 300 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 349 hp/t 260 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 316 hp/t 236 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 (Stage 3) 360 hp | Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 (Stage 2) 312 hp | Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 (Stage 1) 283 hp | Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 240 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 (Stage 3) 360 hp
- Has 48 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 54 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 (Stage 2) 312 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected
Popular comparisons
Alfa Romeo4C1.7vsAlfa Romeo4C Spider1.7
Alfa Romeo4C1.7vsBMW4 Series Coupe (F32)428i
Alfa Romeo4C1.7vsBMW2 Series Coupe (F22)228i
Alfa Romeo4C1.7vsAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
Alfa Romeo4C1.7vsBMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)428i
Alfa Romeo4C1.7vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300
Alfa Romeo4C1.7vsSeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI
Alfa Romeo4C1.7vsAUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSI
Alfa Romeo4C1.7vsPorscheCayman (981C)2.7
Alfa Romeo4C1.7vsPeugeotRCZFacelift 2013R 1.6 THP
Alfa Romeo4C1.7vsAUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
Alfa Romeo4C1.7vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6