Alfa Romeo 164 (164)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24VvsNissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Cedric (Y33)
3.0T V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Most powerful270 hp201 kW
- Highest torque368 Nm271 lb-ft
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight172 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score72/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 228hp170kW | 270hp201kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 368Nm271lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 2,165kg4,773lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 66.9s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.0s Calculated | 25.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.3L/100 km12.9mpg US15.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 167Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 620km385mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,959cc181cu in | 2,987cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,670mm184in | - |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | - |
| Height | 1,360mm54in | - |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | - |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,505mm59in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 504L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V: Power / Torque
- Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.0 s | 25.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | 228 hp 170 kW |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 270 hp 201 kW |
Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 has 42 hp more than Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V and Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: 42 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 368 Nm 271 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | 7.5 s |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 and Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | 228 hp 170 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 270 hp 201 kW | 7.0 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 228 hp 170 kW | 270 hp 201 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 368 Nm 271 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 620 km 385 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 504 L 17.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,386 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
- Has 42 hp more
- Has 88 Nm more
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























