Car comparison

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24VvsNissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo 164 (164)

3.0 24V

228 hp2959 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan1994-1998
VS

Nissan Cedric (Y33)

3.0T V6

270 hp2987 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan1995-1997

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Most powerful
    270 hp
    201 kW
  • Highest torque
    368 Nm
    271 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,570 kg
    3,461 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    172 hp/t
    128 kW/t
    5.8 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    72/100
  • Best practicality score
    79/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24VNissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
Power
228hp170kW
270hp201kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
368Nm271lb-ft
Curb weight
1,680kg3,704lb
1,570kg3,461lb
Gross weight
2,165kg4,773lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
236 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
75.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
66.9s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
25.0s
Calculated
25.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18.3L/100 km12.9mpg US15.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
167Nm/t112lb-ft/ton
Calculated
234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
620km385mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,959cc181cu in
2,987cc182cu in
Length
4,670mm184in
-
Width
1,760mm69in
-
Height
1,360mm54in
-
Wheelbase
2,660mm105in
-
Front track
1,530mm60in
-
Rear track
1,505mm59in
-
Ground clearance-
145mm6in
Trunk volume
504L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
80L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24VNissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V: Power / Torque
  • Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V6,300 rpm5,000 rpm6,550 rpm
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V66,000 rpm3,600 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24VNissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.0 s
25.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
236 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V
228 hp
170 kW
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
270 hp
201 kW

Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 has 42 hp more than Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V and Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: 42 hp (31 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
368 Nm
271 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
1,570 kg
3,461 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
236 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V7.5 s
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V67.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 and Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V
228 hp
170 kW
7.5 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
270 hp
201 kW
7.0 s
236 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V
Power
228 hp
170 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
504 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,360 mm
53.5 in
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
Power
270 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length-
Height-

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24VNissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
Power
228 hp
170 kW
270 hp
201 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
368 Nm
271 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
Fuel consumption
-
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
504 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,360 mm
53.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length-
Height-
Range score
-
620 km
385 mi
Trunk score
504 L
17.8 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
Consumption12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi36.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,386 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6

  • Has 42 hp more
  • Has 88 Nm more
  • Is 110 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V
Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V vs Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster