Alfa Romeo 164 (164)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24VvsAlfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 156 (932)
2.5 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful228 hp170 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Largest trunk504 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight144 hp/t107 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption16.5 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best economy score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 228hp170kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 222Nm164lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,320kg2,910lb |
| Gross weight | 2,165kg4,773lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 75.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 69.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.0s Calculated | 26.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.3L/100 km12.9mpg US15.4mpg UK | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 167Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated | 168Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 548km340mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,959cc181cu in | 2,492cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,670mm184in | 4,430mm174in |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | 1,745mm69in |
| Height | 1,360mm54in | 1,415mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,511mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,505mm59in | 1,498mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 504L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.0 s | 26.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | 228 hp 170 kW |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 190 hp 142 kW |
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V has 38 hp more than Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V and Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V: 38 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 222 Nm 164 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | 7.5 s |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V and Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | 228 hp 170 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo164 (164)3.0 24V | Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 228 hp 170 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 222 Nm 164 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 548 km 340 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 504 L 17.8 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 164 (164) 3.0 24V
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 58 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 124 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V
- Is 360 kg lighter
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























