Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6vsJaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar X-Type Estate
3.0 i V6 24V Sport
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque322 Nm237 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score76/100
Jaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Lowest city consumption14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 322Nm237lb-ft | 279Nm206lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | 2,210kg4,872lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.3s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 69.4s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.5s Calculated | 27.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.7L/100 km14.1mpg US16.9mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 605km376mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,195cc195cu in | 2,968cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,660mm183in | 4,716mm186in |
| Width | 1,828mm72in | 1,789mm70in |
| Height | 1,422mm56in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,710mm107in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,537mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,235L | 1,415L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 69L | 61L |
| CO2 emissions | 270g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 6,300 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 6,800 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.5 s | 27.9 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 231 hp 172 kW |
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6 has 29 hp more than Jaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport and Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6: 29 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 279 Nm 206 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 7.0 s |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6 and Jaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.0 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.2 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | JaguarX-Type Estate3.0 i V6 24V Sport | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | 279 Nm 206 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 605 km 376 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 270 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6
- Has 29 hp more
- Has 43 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Jaguar X-Type Estate 3.0 i V6 24V Sport
- Is 50 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























