BMW 5 Series Touring (E61)
Car comparison
BMW 5 Series Touring (E61) 535dvsAlfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon
3.2 JTS V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 5 Series Touring (E61) 535d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque560 Nm413 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Best economy score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 560Nm413lb-ft | 322Nm237lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,315kg5,104lb | 2,210kg4,872lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 70.3s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.6s Calculated | 24.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 16.7L/100 km14.1mpg US16.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 318Nm/t213lb-ft/ton Calculated | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 605km376mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 3,195cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,843mm191in | 4,660mm183in |
| Width | 1,846mm73in | 1,828mm72in |
| Height | 1,491mm59in | 1,422mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,886mm114in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,558mm61in | 1,578mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,581mm62in | 1,555mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,650L | 1,235L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 69L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 270g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 5 Series Touring (E61) 535d: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 6,300 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.6 s | 24.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | 272 hp 203 kW |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
BMW 5 Series Touring (E61) 535d has 12 hp more than Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6 and BMW 5 Series Touring (E61) 535d: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 244 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | 6.6 s |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 5 Series Touring (E61) 535d and Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | 272 hp 203 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.0 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 605 km 376 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 270 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 5 Series Touring (E61) 535d
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 238 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























