Volvo V50
Car comparison
Volvo V50 2.5 T5vsAlfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon
2.4 JTDM 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V50 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions181 g/km
- Best estimated range1,014 km630 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV502.5 T5 | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,635kg3,605lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,185kg4,817lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 79.8s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.4s Calculated | 33.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km353mi Calculated | 1,014km630mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,387cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,514mm178in | 4,660mm183in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,828mm72in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,422mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,578mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,555mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 417L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,307L | 1,235L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 243g/km | 181g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V50 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV502.5 T5 | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.4 s | 33.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
Volvo V50 2.5 T5 has 10 hp more than Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V and Volvo V50 2.5 T5: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 7.6 s |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V50 2.5 T5 and Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V and Volvo V50 2.5 T5: 3.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 569 km 353 mi |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 1,014 km 630 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.3 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV502.5 T5 | Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 353 mi | 1,014 km 630 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 243 g/km | 181 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V50 2.5 T5 | Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V50 2.5 T5
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 446 km (277 mi) more estimated range
- Has 28 L more trunk volume
- Emits 62 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























