Car comparison

Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20VvsRenault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon

2.4 JTDM 20V

210 hp2387 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2009
VS

Renault Laguna III Grandtour

2.0 dCi FAP

178 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    229 km/h
    142 mph
  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    128 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,014 km
    630 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100

Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP

  • Lightest
    1,613 kg
    3,556 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    508 L
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20VRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
Power
210hp157kW
178hp133kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
1,635kg3,605lb
1,613kg3,556lb
Gross weight
2,185kg4,817lb
2,055kg4,530lb
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
213 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
79.8s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
77.3s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.3s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
33.4s
Calculated
44.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton
Calculated
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,014km630mi
Calculated
985km612mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,387cc146cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,660mm183in
4,803mm189in
Width
1,828mm72in
1,811mm71in
Height
1,422mm56in
1,445mm57in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,756mm109in
Front track
1,578mm62in
-
Rear track
1,555mm61in
-
Trunk volume
445L
508L
Max trunk volume
1,235L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
66L
CO2 emissions
181g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20VRenault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAPPowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V: Power / Torque
  • Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V4,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP3,750 rpm2,000 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20VRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.3 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.4 s
44.6 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
213 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
210 hp
157 kW
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
178 hp
133 kW

Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V has 32 hp more than Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP and Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V: 32 hp (24 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
1,635 kg
3,605 lb
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
1,613 kg
3,556 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
229 km/h
142 mph
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
213 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V8.3 s
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP8.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V and Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
1,014 km
630 mi
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
985 km
612 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
210 hp
157 kW
8.3 s
229 km/h
142 mph
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
178 hp
133 kW
8.7 s
213 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,660 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,422 mm
56.0 in
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
213 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
213 km/h
132 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
8.3 s
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20VRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
Power
210 hp
157 kW
178 hp
133 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.3 s
8.7 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
213 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,635 kg
3,605 lb
1,613 kg
3,556 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,660 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,422 mm
56.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
Range score
1,014 km
630 mi
985 km
612 mi
CO2 score
181 g/km
-
Trunk score
445 L
15.7 cu ft
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20VRenault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km11.73 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi18.87 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year1,759 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V

  • Has 32 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP

  • Is 22 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 63 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.4 JTDM 20V
2.4 JTDM 20V
VS
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20VvsAlfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 i 16V Turbo
VS
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo
2.4 JTDM 20V
2.0 T
VS
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20VvsCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 dCi FAP
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna Grandtour2.9 24V
2.4 JTDM 20V
2.5T
VS
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20VvsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 16V Turbo
VS
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
2.4 JTDM 20V
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20VvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
2.4 JTDM 20V
2.4 D5
VS
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20VvsVolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5
2.0 dCi FAP
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna2.9 24V
2.4 JTDM 20V
2.5 i V6 24V Sport
VS
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20VvsJaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.4 JTDM 20V vs Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP - car comparison - FastVsFaster