Car comparison

Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6vsNissan Teana 3.5 i V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo 159

3.2 JTS V6

260 hp3195 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan2005-2009

Nissan Teana

3.5 i V6

245 hp3498 ccGasolineFWDNaturally aspiratedSedan2003-2008

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6

Highest torque
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Lightest
1,589 kg
3,503 lb
Lowest combined fuel consumption
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
Lowest city consumption
15.0 L/100 km
15.7 mpg US
18.8 mpg UK
Best estimated range
648 km
403 mi
Largest trunk
476 L
Best economy score
78/100
Best practicality score
75/100

Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6

Quickest 0-100 km/h
7.0 s
Fastest top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Most powerful
260 hp
194 kW
Best power-to-weight
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Lowest highway consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Best overall score
61/100
Best performance score
57/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6	NissanTeana3.5 i V6
Power	260hp194kW	245hp183kW
Torque	322Nm237lb-ft	330Nm243lb-ft
Curb weight	1,610kg3,549lb	1,589kg3,503lb
Gross weight	2,160kg4,762lb	2,040kg4,497lb
Top speed	244 km/h 152 mph	Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated
To 99% top speed	65.3s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated	66.7s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	7.0s	7.9s
0-200 km/h	23.6s Calculated	31.0s Calculated
0-60 mph	6.7s Calculated	7.5s Calculated
Fuel consumption	11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK	10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	16.7L/100 km14.1mpg US16.9mpg UK	15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK	8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile	14.9s Calculated	15.7s Calculated
Power-to-weight	161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated	154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated	208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	605km376mi Calculated	648km403mi Calculated
Displacement	3,195cc195cu in	3,498cc213cu in
Length	4,660mm183in	4,845mm191in
Width	1,828mm72in	1,765mm69in
Height	1,422mm56in	1,475mm58in
Wheelbase	2,700mm106in	2,775mm109in
Front track	1,578mm62in	1,530mm60in
Rear track	1,555mm61in	1,535mm60in
Trunk volume	405L	476L
Doors	4	4
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	69L	70L
CO2 emissions	270g/km	-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6PowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6	6,300 rpm	4,500 rpm	6,550 rpm
NissanTeana3.5 i V6	6,000 rpm	3,600 rpm	6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6	NissanTeana3.5 i V6
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	6.7 s	7.5 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	7.0 s	7.9 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	23.6 s	31.0 s
Top speed	244 km/h 152 mph	Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.7 s	2.8 s
330 ft 101 m	6.8 s	7.1 s
1/8 mile 201 m	9.9 s	10.5 s
1000 ft 305 m	12.7 s	13.3 s
1/4 mile 402 m	14.9 s	15.7 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	163 km/h 101 mph	153 km/h 95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6	260 hp 194 kW
NissanTeana3.5 i V6	245 hp 183 kW

Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6 has 15 hp more than Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6 and Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6	322 Nm 237 lb-ft
NissanTeana3.5 i V6	330 Nm 243 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6	1,610 kg 3,549 lb
NissanTeana3.5 i V6	1,589 kg 3,503 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6	244 km/h 152 mph
NissanTeana3.5 i V6	Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6	7.0 s
NissanTeana3.5 i V6	7.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6 and Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6	11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK
NissanTeana3.5 i V6	10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6 and Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6	161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp
NissanTeana3.5 i V6	154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6	605 km 376 mi
NissanTeana3.5 i V6	648 km 403 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6	260 hp 194 kW	7.0 s	244 km/h 152 mph
NissanTeana3.5 i V6	245 hp 183 kW	7.9 s	Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6

Power	260 hp 194 kW
0-100 km/h	7.0 s
Top speed 244 km/h 152 mph

Doors/seats	4 doors 5 seats
Trunk	405 L 14.3 cu ft
Length	4,660 mm 183.5 in
Height	1,422 mm 56.0 in

NissanTeana3.5 i V6

Power	245 hp 183 kW
0-100 km/h	7.9 s
Top speed Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph

Doors/seats	4 doors 5 seats
Trunk	476 L 16.8 cu ft
Length	4,845 mm 190.7 in
Height	1,475 mm 58.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6

Power	260 hp 194 kW
0-100 km/h	7.0 s
Top speed 244 km/h 152 mph

11.4 L/100 km

20.6 mpg US

24.8 mpg UK

NissanTeana3.5 i V6

Power	245 hp 183 kW
0-100 km/h	7.9 s
Top speed Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph

10.8 L/100 km

21.8 mpg US

26.2 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6	11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK	7.0 s
NissanTeana3.5 i V6	10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK	7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6	161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp	11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK
NissanTeana3.5 i V6	154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp	10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6

NissanTeana3.5 i V6

Power

260 hp

194 kW

245 hp

183 kW

Torque

322 Nm

237 lb-ft

330 Nm

243 lb-ft

Acceleration

7.0 s

7.9 s

Top speed

244 km/h

152 mph

Unrestricted

225 km/h140 mph

Restricted

210 km/h130 mph

Lightness

1,610 kg

3,549 lb

1,589 kg

3,503 lb

Fuel consumption

11.4 L/100 km

20.6 mpg US

24.8 mpg UK

10.8 L/100 km

21.8 mpg US

26.2 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	4 doors 5 seats
Trunk	405 L 14.3 cu ft
Length	4,660 mm 183.5 in
Height	1,422 mm 56.0 in

Doors/seats	4 doors 5 seats
Trunk	476 L 16.8 cu ft
Length	4,845 mm 190.7 in
Height	1,475 mm 58.1 in

Range score

605 km

376 mi

648 km

403 mi

CO2 score

270 g/km

Trunk score

405 L

14.3 cu ft

476 L

16.8 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

161 hp/t

120 kW/t

6.2 kg/hp

154 hp/t

115 kW/t

6.5 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6	Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6
Consumption	11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK	10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	19.95 LC100 km	18.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	32.11 LC100 mi	30.42 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal	1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	2,993 LC/year	2,835 LC/year