Alfa Romeo 159
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6vsKia Opirus 3.8 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonKia Opirus
3.8 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Kia Opirus 3.8 i V6 24V
- Most powerful266 hp198 kW
- Highest torque353 Nm260 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range642 km399 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score58/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | KiaOpirus3.8 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 266hp198kW |
| Torque | 322Nm237lb-ft | 353Nm260lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,825kg4,023lb |
| Gross weight | 2,090kg4,608lb | 2,270kg5,004lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 74.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.0s Calculated | 25.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 636km395mi Calculated | 642km399mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,195cc195cu in | 3,778cc231cu in |
| Length | 4,660mm183in | 4,970mm196in |
| Width | 1,828mm72in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,422mm56in | 1,486mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,590mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 405L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 450L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 260g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
- Kia Opirus 3.8 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 6,300 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| KiaOpirus3.8 i V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | KiaOpirus3.8 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.0 s | 25.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| KiaOpirus3.8 i V6 24V | 266 hp 198 kW |
Kia Opirus 3.8 i V6 24V has 6 hp more than Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6 and Kia Opirus 3.8 i V6 24V: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
| KiaOpirus3.8 i V6 24V | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| KiaOpirus3.8 i V6 24V | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| KiaOpirus3.8 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 7.1 s |
| KiaOpirus3.8 i V6 24V | 7.5 s |
Although Kia Opirus 3.8 i V6 24V has more power, Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6 and Kia Opirus 3.8 i V6 24V: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| KiaOpirus3.8 i V6 24V | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| KiaOpirus3.8 i V6 24V | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 636 km 395 mi |
| KiaOpirus3.8 i V6 24V | 642 km 399 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| KiaOpirus3.8 i V6 24V | 266 hp 198 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KiaOpirus3.8 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| KiaOpirus3.8 i V6 24V |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| KiaOpirus3.8 i V6 24V | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| KiaOpirus3.8 i V6 24V | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | KiaOpirus3.8 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 266 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 636 km 395 mi | 642 km 399 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 260 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6 | Kia Opirus 3.8 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6
- Is 285 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Kia Opirus 3.8 i V6 24V
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 31 Nm more
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 km (4 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























