BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90)
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 330ivsAlfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 159
3.2 JTS V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 330i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Lightest1,525 kg3,362 lb
- Best power-to-weight178 hp/t133 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range724 km450 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6
- Highest torque322 Nm237 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)330i | Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 315Nm232lb-ft | 322Nm237lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,525kg3,362lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,090kg4,608lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 60.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 70.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.9s Calculated | 22.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 178hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 724km450mi Calculated | 636km395mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 3,195cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,520mm178in | 4,660mm183in |
| Width | 1,817mm72in | 1,828mm72in |
| Height | 1,421mm56in | 1,422mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,578mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,513mm60in | 1,555mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 405L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 260g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 330i: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)330i | 6,650 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,900 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 6,300 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)330i | Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.9 s | 22.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 108 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)330i | 272 hp 203 kW |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 330i has 12 hp more than Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6 and BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 330i: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)330i | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)330i | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)330i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)330i | 6.1 s |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 330i and Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)330i | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 330i and Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)330i | 178 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)330i | 724 km 450 mi |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 636 km 395 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)330i | 272 hp 203 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)330i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)330i |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 330i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)330i | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)330i | 178 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)330i | Alfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 724 km 450 mi | 636 km 395 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 260 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 178 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 330i | Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.22 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,284 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 330i
- Has 12 hp more
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 88 km (55 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 JTS V6
- Has 7 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























