Volkswagen Jetta V
Car comparison
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSIvsAlfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 159
2.4 JTDM 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions179 g/km
- Best estimated range1,029 km640 mi
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score89/100
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Lightest1,373 kg3,027 lb
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk527 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,373kg3,027lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 2,135kg4,707lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 72.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.8s Calculated | 30.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated | 252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 688km427mi Calculated | 1,029km640mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,387cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,554mm179in | 4,660mm183in |
| Width | 1,781mm70in | 1,828mm72in |
| Height | 1,459mm57in | 1,422mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,578mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,512mm60in | 1,555mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 527L | 405L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 189g/km | 179g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.8 s | 30.5 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 1,373 kg 3,027 lb |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 7.5 s |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 8.1 s |
Although Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V has more power, Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V and Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 688 km 427 mi |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 1,029 km 640 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.1 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,373 kg 3,027 lb | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 688 km 427 mi | 1,029 km 640 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 189 g/km | 179 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 527 L 18.6 cu ft | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI | Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Is 212 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 122 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 342 km (212 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























