Alfa Romeo 159
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20VvsAlfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 156 (932)
2.5 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,029 km640 mi
- Largest trunk405 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 222Nm164lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,585kg3,494lb | 1,350kg2,976lb |
| Gross weight | 2,135kg4,707lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 62.9s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.5s Calculated | 28.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,029km640mi Calculated | 548km340mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,387cc146cu in | 2,492cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,660mm183in | 4,430mm174in |
| Width | 1,828mm72in | 1,745mm69in |
| Height | 1,422mm56in | 1,415mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,511mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,498mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 405L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 179g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.5 s | 28.4 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 190 hp 142 kW |
Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V and Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 222 Nm 164 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 8.1 s |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 7.4 s |
Although Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V has more power, Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V and Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V and Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V: 4.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 1,029 km 640 mi |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 548 km 340 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.1 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo1592.4 JTDM 20V | Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 222 Nm 164 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,029 km 640 mi | 548 km 340 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 179 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V | Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 159 2.4 JTDM 20V
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 178 Nm more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 482 km (299 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V
- Is 235 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























