Alfa Romeo 156 (932)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24VvsPeugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot 607
3.0 V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V
- Most powerful207 hp154 kW
- Highest torque285 Nm210 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range816 km507 mi
- Largest trunk481 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight144 hp/t107 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 207hp154kW |
| Torque | 222Nm164lb-ft | 285Nm210lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,635kg3,605lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 2,140kg4,718lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 78.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.3s Calculated | 28.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 168Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated | 174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 548km340mi Calculated | 816km507mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,492cc152cu in | 2,946cc180cu in |
| Length | 4,430mm174in | 4,877mm192in |
| Width | 1,745mm69in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,415mm56in | 1,437mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,511mm59in | 1,539mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,498mm59in | 1,537mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 481L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.3 s | 28.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 207 hp 154 kW |
Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V has 17 hp more than Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V and Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 222 Nm 164 lb-ft |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 7.6 s |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 8.1 s |
Although Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V has more power, Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V and Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V and Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 548 km 340 mi |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 816 km 507 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 207 hp 154 kW | 8.1 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 207 hp 154 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 222 Nm 164 lb-ft | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 548 km 340 mi | 816 km 507 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 481 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V | Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V
- Is 315 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V
- Has 17 hp more
- Has 63 Nm more
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 269 km (167 mi) more estimated range
- Has 101 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























