Alfa Romeo 156 (932) · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) · Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24VvsPeugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot 406 (PHASE II)
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6
- Most powerful207 hp154 kW
- Highest torque285 Nm210 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.7 L/100 km17.2 mpg US20.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best practicality score72/100
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,405 kg3,097 lb
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 207hp154kW |
| Torque | 218Nm161lb-ft | 285Nm210lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 1,455kg3,208lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 74.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.4s Calculated | 28.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 155Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 534km332mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,492cc152cu in | 2,946cc180cu in |
| Length | 4,435mm175in | 4,600mm181in |
| Width | 1,745mm69in | 1,765mm69in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,404mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,511mm59in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,498mm59in | 1,482mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 378L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.4 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 192 hp 143 kW |
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 207 hp 154 kW |
Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 has 15 hp more than Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V and Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 218 Nm 161 lb-ft |
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 7.3 s |
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 8.1 s |
Although Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 has more power, Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V and Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 207 hp 154 kW | 8.1 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 207 hp 154 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 218 Nm 161 lb-ft | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 534 km 332 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 378 L 13.3 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 67 Nm more
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 52 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























