AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D)
Car comparison
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30VvsAlfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 156 (932)
2.5 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Most powerful193 hp144 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range667 km414 mi
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30V | Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193hp144kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 222Nm164lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,350kg2,976lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.3s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 62.9s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.8s Calculated | 28.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 548km340mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,771cc169cu in | 2,492cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,479mm176in | 4,430mm174in |
| Width | 1,733mm68in | 1,745mm69in |
| Height | 1,415mm56in | 1,415mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,607mm103in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | 1,498mm59in | 1,511mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,477mm58in | 1,498mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30V | 6,000 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30V | Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.8 s | 28.4 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30V | 193 hp 144 kW |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 190 hp 142 kW |
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V has 3 hp more than Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V and AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30V | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 222 Nm 164 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30V | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30V | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30V | 7.3 s |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V and Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30V | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V and Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30V | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30V | 667 km 414 mi |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 548 km 340 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30V | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.3 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30V |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30V | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30V | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30V | Alfa Romeo156 (932)2.5 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp 144 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 222 Nm 164 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 548 km 340 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V | Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 58 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 119 km (74 mi) more estimated range
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) 2.5 i V6 24V
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























