Peugeot 406 (PHASE II)
Car comparison
Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6vsAlfa Romeo 156 (932) · Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 156 (932) · Facelift 2003
2.5 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful207 hp154 kW
- Highest torque285 Nm210 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.7 L/100 km17.2 mpg US20.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V
- Lightest1,405 kg3,097 lb
- Best economy score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 207hp154kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 285Nm210lb-ft | 218Nm161lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,405kg3,097lb |
| Gross weight | 1,995kg4,398lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 72.7s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.1s Calculated | 32.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 155Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 529km329mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,946cc180cu in | 2,492cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,600mm181in | 4,435mm175in |
| Width | 1,765mm69in | 1,743mm69in |
| Height | 1,404mm55in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,511mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,482mm58in | 1,498mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 378L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.1 s | 32.7 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 207 hp 154 kW |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 192 hp 143 kW |
Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 has 15 hp more than Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V and Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 218 Nm 161 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 8.1 s |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 and Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 207 hp 154 kW | 8.1 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 192 hp 143 kW | 8.5 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 207 hp 154 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft | 218 Nm 161 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 529 km 329 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 378 L 13.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 67 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 52 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V
- Is 50 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























