Volkswagen Jetta V
Car comparison
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSIvsAlfa Romeo 156 (932) · Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo 156 (932) · Facelift 2003
2.5 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range688 km427 mi
- Largest trunk527 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V
- Lightest1,405 kg3,097 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 218Nm161lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,526kg3,364lb | 1,405kg3,097lb |
| Gross weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 72.7s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.7s Calculated | 32.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 155Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 688km427mi Calculated | 529km329mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,492cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,554mm179in | 4,435mm175in |
| Width | 1,781mm70in | 1,743mm69in |
| Height | 1,459mm57in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,511mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,512mm60in | 1,498mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 527L | 378L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.7 s | 32.7 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 192 hp 143 kW |
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI has 8 hp more than Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V and Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 218 Nm 161 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 7.2 s |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V: 3.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 688 km 427 mi |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 529 km 329 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.2 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 192 hp 143 kW | 8.5 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 218 Nm 161 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 688 km 427 mi | 529 km 329 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 527 L 18.6 cu ft | 378 L 13.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI | Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 62 Nm more
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 158 km (98 mi) more estimated range
- Has 149 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V
- Is 121 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























