Alfa Romeo GTV (916)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6vsAcura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAcura RSX
2.0 i 16V Type S
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Lightest1,310 kg2,888 lb
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk504 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best practicality score55/100
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6
- Fastest top speed248 km/h154 mph
- Most powerful218 hp163 kW
- Highest torque265 Nm195 lb-ft
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score0/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218hp163kW | 212hp158kW |
| Torque | 265Nm195lb-ft | 194Nm143lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,415kg3,120lb | 1,310kg2,888lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | - |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.5s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 64.8s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.2s Calculated | 31.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 148Nm/t99lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,959cc181cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,285mm169in | 4,374mm172in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,725mm68in |
| Height | 1,318mm52in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,540mm100in | 2,570mm101in |
| Front track | 1,499mm59in | 1,486mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,486mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 155L | 504L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 7,800 rpm | 7,000 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.2 s | 31.8 s |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 212 hp 158 kW |
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6 has 6 hp more than Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S.
The biggest power difference is between Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 194 Nm 143 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 6.7 s |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 6.2 s |
Although Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6 has more power, Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | 218 hp 163 kW | 6.7 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 212 hp 158 kW | 6.2 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6 | AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp 163 kW | 212 hp 158 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | 194 Nm 143 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 155 L 5.5 cu ft | 504 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 3.0 V6
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 71 Nm more
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 349 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























