Volkswagen Phaeton
Car comparison
Volkswagen Phaeton 4.2 i V8 40VvsAcura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAcura RL II
3.5 i V6 24V AWD
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Phaeton 4.2 i V8 40V
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful335 hp250 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score72/100
Acura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Lightest1,845 kg4,068 lb
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.1 L/100 km18.0 mpg US21.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 335hp250kW | 304hp227kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 347Nm256lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,205kg4,861lb | 1,845kg4,068lb |
| Gross weight | 2,730kg6,019lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 53.6s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.4s Calculated | 30.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 692km430mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,172cc255cu in | 3,471cc212cu in |
| Length | 5,055mm199in | 4,917mm194in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,847mm73in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,881mm113in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,612mm63in | 1,585mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 450L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 73L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Phaeton 4.2 i V8 40V: Power / Torque
- Acura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 6,200 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.4 s | 30.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | 335 hp 250 kW |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 304 hp 227 kW |
Volkswagen Phaeton 4.2 i V8 40V has 31 hp more than Acura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD.
The biggest power difference is between Acura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD and Volkswagen Phaeton 4.2 i V8 40V: 31 hp (23 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 347 Nm 256 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | 6.9 s |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 6.7 s |
Although Volkswagen Phaeton 4.2 i V8 40V has more power, Acura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Acura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD and Volkswagen Phaeton 4.2 i V8 40V: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | 335 hp 250 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 304 hp 227 kW | 6.7 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPhaeton4.2 i V8 40V | AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 335 hp 250 kW | 304 hp 227 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 347 Nm 256 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 692 km 430 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Phaeton 4.2 i V8 40V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.61 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,413 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Phaeton 4.2 i V8 40V
- Has 31 hp more
- Has 83 Nm more
- Has 45 km/h (28 mph) higher top speed
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Acura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD
- Is 360 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























