AUDI A8L (D3/4E) · Facelift 2005
Car comparison
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) · Facelift 2005 4.2 BiTDI V8vsAcura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAcura RL II
3.5 i V6 24V AWD
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 4.2 BiTDI V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful326 hp243 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Acura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD
- Lightest1,845 kg4,068 lb
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.1 L/100 km18.0 mpg US21.6 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 BiTDI V8 | AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326hp243kW | 304hp227kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 347Nm256lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,995kg4,398lb | 1,845kg4,068lb |
| Gross weight | 2,595kg5,721lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 53.6s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.9s Calculated | 30.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 326Nm/t218lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 957km595mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,134cc252cu in | 3,471cc212cu in |
| Length | 5,192mm204in | 4,917mm194in |
| Width | 1,894mm75in | 1,847mm73in |
| Height | 1,455mm57in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,074mm121in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,629mm64in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,615mm64in | 1,585mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 450L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 73L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 4.2 BiTDI V8: Power / Torque
- Acura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 BiTDI V8 | 3,750 rpm | 1,600-3,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 6,200 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 BiTDI V8 | AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.9 s | 30.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 107 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 BiTDI V8 | 326 hp 243 kW |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 304 hp 227 kW |
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 4.2 BiTDI V8 has 22 hp more than Acura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD.
The biggest power difference is between Acura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD and AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 4.2 BiTDI V8: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 BiTDI V8 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 347 Nm 256 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 BiTDI V8 | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 BiTDI V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 BiTDI V8 | 6.1 s |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 4.2 BiTDI V8 and Acura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 BiTDI V8 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 BiTDI V8 | 326 hp 243 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 304 hp 227 kW | 6.7 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 BiTDI V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 BiTDI V8 | AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp 243 kW | 304 hp 227 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 347 Nm 256 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 957 km 595 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 4.2 BiTDI V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A8L (D3/4E) Facelift 2005 4.2 BiTDI V8
- Has 22 hp more
- Has 303 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Acura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























