Toyota Camry VI (XV40)
Car comparison
Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6vsAcura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAcura RL II
3.5 i V6 24V AWD
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,685 kg3,715 lb
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk535 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Acura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Most powerful304 hp227 kW
- Highest torque347 Nm256 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.1 L/100 km18.0 mpg US21.6 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 277hp207kW | 304hp227kW |
| Torque | 346Nm255lb-ft | 347Nm256lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,845kg4,068lb |
| Gross weight | 2,050kg4,519lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 53.6s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.8s Calculated | 30.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 164hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 707km439mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 3,471cc212cu in |
| Length | 4,815mm190in | 4,917mm194in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,847mm73in |
| Height | 1,480mm58in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,775mm109in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 160mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 535L | 450L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 73L |
| CO2 emissions | 233g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6: Power / Torque
- Acura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,700 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 6,200 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.8 s | 30.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 277 hp 207 kW |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 304 hp 227 kW |
Acura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD has 27 hp more than Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6 and Acura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 347 Nm 256 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 6.8 s |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Acura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD and Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | 277 hp 207 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 304 hp 227 kW | 6.7 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6 | AcuraRL II3.5 i V6 24V AWD | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 277 hp 207 kW | 304 hp 227 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft | 347 Nm 256 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 707 km 439 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 233 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 535 L 18.9 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Toyota Camry VI (XV40) 3.5i V6
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 85 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Acura RL II 3.5 i V6 24V AWD
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 1 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























