AC Cobra (MK IV)
Car comparison
AC Cobra (MK IV) 5.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz CLK (C208) · Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CLK (C208) · Facelift 1999
AMG CLK 55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AC Cobra (MK IV) 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful370 hp276 kW
- Highest torque579 Nm427 lb-ft
- Lightest900 kg1,984 lb
- Best power-to-weight411 hp/t307 kW/t2.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20.0 mpg UK
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score77/100
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ACCobra (MK IV)5.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 370hp276kW | 347hp259kW |
| Torque | 579Nm427lb-ft | 510Nm376lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 900kg1,984lb | 1,545kg3,406lb |
| Gross weight | 1,340kg2,954lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 69.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.9s Calculated | 18.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 411hp/t307kW/t186hp/1000 lb Calculated | 225hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 643Nm/t430lb-ft/ton Calculated | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 530km329mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,942cc302cu in | 5,439cc332cu in |
| Length | 4,200mm165in | 4,567mm180in |
| Width | 1,746mm69in | 1,722mm68in |
| Height | 1,200mm47in | 1,371mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,285mm90in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,420mm56in | 1,505mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,485mm58in | 1,488mm59in |
| Trunk volume | - | 420L |
| Max trunk volume | 270L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AC Cobra (MK IV) 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACCobra (MK IV)5.0 V8 | 5,750 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000-4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ACCobra (MK IV)5.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.9 s | 18.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACCobra (MK IV)5.0 V8 | 370 hp 276 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW |
AC Cobra (MK IV) 5.0 V8 has 23 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 and AC Cobra (MK IV) 5.0 V8: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACCobra (MK IV)5.0 V8 | 579 Nm 427 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACCobra (MK IV)5.0 V8 | 900 kg 1,984 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACCobra (MK IV)5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACCobra (MK IV)5.0 V8 | 5.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AC Cobra (MK IV) 5.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ACCobra (MK IV)5.0 V8 | 411 hp/t 307 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 225 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACCobra (MK IV)5.0 V8 | 370 hp 276 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACCobra (MK IV)5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ACCobra (MK IV)5.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 370 hp 276 kW | 347 hp 259 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 579 Nm 427 lb-ft | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 900 kg 1,984 lb | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 530 km 329 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 411 hp/t 307 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp | 225 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AC Cobra (MK IV) 5.0 V8
- Has 23 hp more
- Has 69 Nm more
- Is 645 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 187 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























