Peugeot 206 · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
Peugeot 206 · Facelift 2003 2.0 RCvsAbarth Grande Punto (199) Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth Grande Punto (199)
Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Peugeot 206 Facelift 2003 2.0 RC
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,100 kg2,425 lb
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score60/100
Abarth Grande Punto (199) Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Largest trunk275 L
Specification comparison
| Model | Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 202Nm149lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,100kg2,425lb | 1,185kg2,612lb |
| Gross weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,665kg3,671lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 72.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.2s Calculated | 38.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 581km361mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 3,835mm151in | 4,041mm159in |
| Width | 1,673mm66in | 1,721mm68in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,442mm96in | 2,510mm99in |
| Front track | 1,437mm57in | 1,476mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,425mm56in | 1,465mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 210L | 275L |
| Max trunk volume | 992L | 1,030L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 45L |
| CO2 emissions | 204g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Peugeot 206 Facelift 2003 2.0 RC: Power / Torque
- Abarth Grande Punto (199) Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet | 5,750 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.2 s | 38.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | 177 hp 132 kW |
| AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet | 180 hp 134 kW |
Abarth Grande Punto (199) Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet has 3 hp more than Peugeot 206 Facelift 2003 2.0 RC.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 206 Facelift 2003 2.0 RC and Abarth Grande Punto (199) Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | 202 Nm 149 lb-ft |
| AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb |
| AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | 7.5 s |
| AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet | 7.5 s |
Although Abarth Grande Punto (199) Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet has more power, Peugeot 206 Facelift 2003 2.0 RC is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.5 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | AbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 202 Nm 149 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 581 km 361 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 204 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 210 L 7.4 cu ft | 275 L 9.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Peugeot 206 Facelift 2003 2.0 RC |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Peugeot 206 Facelift 2003 2.0 RC
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Abarth Grande Punto (199) Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 68 Nm more
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























