Peugeot 206 · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
Peugeot 206 · Facelift 2003 2.0 RCvsMercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz A-class (W169)
A 200 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Most powerful193 hp144 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range684 km425 mi
- Largest trunk435 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Peugeot 206 Facelift 2003 2.0 RC
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,100 kg2,425 lb
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 202Nm149lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,100kg2,425lb | 1,305kg2,877lb |
| Gross weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 76.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.1s Calculated | 35.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 581km361mi Calculated | 684km425mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 2,034cc124cu in |
| Length | 3,835mm151in | 3,838mm151in |
| Width | 1,673mm66in | 1,764mm69in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,595mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,442mm96in | 2,568mm101in |
| Front track | 1,437mm57in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,425mm56in | 1,547mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 210L | 435L |
| Max trunk volume | 992L | 1,995L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 54L |
| CO2 emissions | 204g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Peugeot 206 Facelift 2003 2.0 RC: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 5,000 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.1 s | 35.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | 177 hp 132 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW |
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo has 16 hp more than Peugeot 206 Facelift 2003 2.0 RC.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 206 Facelift 2003 2.0 RC and Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | 202 Nm 149 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo and Peugeot 206 Facelift 2003 2.0 RC: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo and Peugeot 206 Facelift 2003 2.0 RC: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | 581 km 361 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 684 km 425 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.3 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Peugeot206Facelift 20032.0 RC | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 202 Nm 149 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 581 km 361 mi | 684 km 425 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 204 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 210 L 7.4 cu ft | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Peugeot 206 Facelift 2003 2.0 RC | Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Peugeot 206 Facelift 2003 2.0 RC
- Is 205 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 78 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 102 km (63 mi) more estimated range
- Has 225 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























