Abarth 595C
Car comparison
Abarth 595C 1.4 T-JetvsAUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V)
1.8 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T
- Most powerful172 hp128 kW
- Highest torque271 Nm200 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Largest trunk320 L
- Best overall score46/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score46/100
Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed209 km/h130 mph
- Lightest1,085 kg2,392 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160hp119kW | 172hp128kW |
| Torque | 230Nm170lb-ft | 271Nm200lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,085kg2,392lb | 1,530kg3,373lb |
| Gross weight | 1,440kg3,175lb | - |
| Top speed | 209 km/h 130 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.8s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 83.5s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 47.9s Calculated | 52.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 547km340mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 3,657mm144in | 4,421mm174in |
| Width | 1,627mm64in | 1,793mm71in |
| Height | 1,488mm59in | 1,409mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,300mm91in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | 1,409mm55in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,402mm55in | 1,526mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 182L | 320L |
| Max trunk volume | 520L | 678L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 35L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 140g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,600-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 47.9 s | 52.6 s |
| Top speed | 209 km/h 130 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 160 hp 119 kW |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 172 hp 128 kW |
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T has 12 hp more than Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet and AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 1,085 kg 2,392 lb |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 7.6 s |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 7.8 s |
Although AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T has more power, Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet and AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 547 km 340 mi |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 160 hp 119 kW | 7.6 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 172 hp 128 kW | 7.8 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 hp 119 kW | 172 hp 128 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 209 km/h 130 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,085 kg 2,392 lb | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 547 km 340 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 140 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 182 L 6.4 cu ft | 320 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet | AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet
- Is 445 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 41 Nm more
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 286 km (178 mi) more estimated range
- Has 138 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























