Abarth 595C · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Abarth 595C · Facelift 2016 1.4 T-JetvsAUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V)
1.8 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,075 kg2,370 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score91/100
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T
- Most powerful172 hp128 kW
- Highest torque271 Nm200 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Largest trunk320 L
- Best overall score46/100
- Best practicality score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 145hp108kW | 172hp128kW |
| Torque | 206Nm152lb-ft | 271Nm200lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,075kg2,370lb | 1,530kg3,373lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 83.5s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.4s Calculated | 52.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 583km362mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 3,660mm144in | 4,421mm174in |
| Width | 1,627mm64in | 1,793mm71in |
| Height | 1,485mm58in | 1,409mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,300mm91in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | 1,415mm56in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,408mm55in | 1,526mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 185L | 320L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 678L |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 35L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | 140g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,600-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.4 s | 52.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 145 hp 108 kW |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 172 hp 128 kW |
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T has 27 hp more than Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet and AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 206 Nm 152 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 1,075 kg 2,370 lb |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 7.8 s |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 7.8 s |
Although AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T has more power, Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 583 km 362 mi |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 145 hp 108 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 172 hp 128 kW | 7.8 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 145 hp 108 kW | 172 hp 128 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 206 Nm 152 lb-ft | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,075 kg 2,370 lb | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 583 km 362 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | 140 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 320 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet | AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet
- Is 455 kg lighter
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 65 Nm more
- Has 250 km (155 mi) more estimated range
- Has 135 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























