Car comparison

Abarth 595 · Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-JetvsVolkswagen Polo VI 1.5 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Abarth 595 · Facelift 2016

Pista 1.4 T-Jet

160 hp1368 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2018-2019
VS

Volkswagen Polo VI

1.5 TSI

150 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedHatchback2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Polo VI 1.5 TSI

  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    116 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    784 km
    487 mi
  • Largest trunk
    351 L
  • Best overall score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    73/100

Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    216 km/h
    134 mph
  • Most powerful
    160 hp
    119 kW
  • Lightest
    1,120 kg
    2,469 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    143 hp/t
    107 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAbarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-JetVolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSI
Power
160hp119kW
150hp112kW
Torque
230Nm170lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,120kg2,469lb
1,235kg2,723lb
Gross weight
1,425kg3,142lb
1,690kg3,726lb
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
69.9s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
84.8s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
36.8s
Calculated
43.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
507km315mi
Calculated
784km487mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,368cc83cu in
1,498cc91cu in
Length
3,660mm144in
4,053mm160in
Width
1,627mm64in
1,751mm69in
Height
1,490mm59in
1,461mm58in
Wheelbase
2,300mm91in
2,551mm100in
Front track-
1,525mm60in
Rear track-
1,509mm59in
Ground clearance-
148mm6in
Trunk volume
185L
351L
Max trunk volume
610L
1,125L
Doors
3
5
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
35L
40L
CO2 emissions
158g/km
116g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-JetVolkswagen Polo VI 1.5 TSIPowerTorque
  • Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Polo VI 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet5,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSI-1,500-3,500 rpm3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAbarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-JetVolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.8 s
43.6 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
144 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet
160 hp
119 kW
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSI
150 hp
112 kW

Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Polo VI 1.5 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Polo VI 1.5 TSI and Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet
230 Nm
170 lb-ft
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet
1,120 kg
2,469 lb
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSI
1,235 kg
2,723 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet
216 km/h
134 mph
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSI
216 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet7.3 s
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSI8.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet and Volkswagen Polo VI 1.5 TSI: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Polo VI 1.5 TSI and Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet
143 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSI
121 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet
507 km
315 mi
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSI
784 km
487 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet
160 hp
119 kW
7.3 s
216 km/h
134 mph
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSI
150 hp
112 kW
8.2 s
216 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet
Power
160 hp
119 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
185 L
6.5 cu ft
Length
3,660 mm
144.1 in
Height
1,490 mm
58.7 in
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
351 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,053 mm
159.6 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet
Power
160 hp
119 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.3 s
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet
143 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSI
121 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAbarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-JetVolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSI
Power
160 hp
119 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
230 Nm
170 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
8.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,120 kg
2,469 lb
1,235 kg
2,723 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
185 L
6.5 cu ft
Length
3,660 mm
144.1 in
Height
1,490 mm
58.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
351 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,053 mm
159.6 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in
Range score
507 km
315 mi
784 km
487 mi
CO2 score
158 g/km
116 g/km
Trunk score
185 L
6.5 cu ft
351 L
12.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
143 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
121 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAbarth 595 Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-JetVolkswagen Polo VI 1.5 TSI
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km8.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi14.36 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal765 L202 US gal168 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year1,339 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 115 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volkswagen Polo VI 1.5 TSI

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 277 km (172 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 166 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 42 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Abarth 595 Pista 1.4 T-Jet
Volkswagen Polo VI 1.5 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Pista 1.4 T-Jet
1.4 T-Jet
VS
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-JetvsAbarth5951.4 T-Jet
1.5 TSI
GTI 1.8 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI
Pista 1.4 T-Jet
Pista 1.4 T-Jet
VS
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-JetvsAbarth595CFacelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet
1.5 TSI
GTI 2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenPolo VIFacelift 2021GTI 2.0 TSI
Pista 1.4 T-Jet
1.4 T-Jet
VS
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-JetvsAbarth595C1.4 T-Jet
1.5 TSI
GTI 1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenPolo V (5-DOOR)GTI 1.4 TSI
Pista 1.4 T-Jet
XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet
VS
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-JetvsAbarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet
1.5 TSI
GTI 1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenPolo V (3-DOOR)GTI 1.4 TSI
Pista 1.4 T-Jet
SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir
VS
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-JetvsAbarthPunto (199)SuperSport 1.4 Turbo MultiAir
1.5 TSI
GTI Cup 1.8
VS
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8
Pista 1.4 T-Jet
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-JetvsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI ACT
VS
VolkswagenPolo VI1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 20171.5 TSI ACT
Abarth 595 · Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet vs Volkswagen Polo VI 1.5 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster