Abarth 695
Car comparison
Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-JetvsAbarth 595 · Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth 595 · Facelift 2016
Pista 1.4 T-Jet
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed217 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful165 hp123 kW
- Highest torque230 Nm170 lb-ft
- Lightest1,110 kg2,447 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best estimated range583 km362 mi
- Largest trunk185 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet | Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 165hp123kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 230Nm170lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,110kg2,447lb | 1,120kg2,469lb |
| Gross weight | 1,425kg3,142lb | 1,425kg3,142lb |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.1s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 69.9s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.0s Calculated | 36.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 583km362mi Calculated | 507km315mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 3,657mm144in | 3,660mm144in |
| Width | 1,647mm65in | 1,627mm64in |
| Height | 1,485mm58in | 1,490mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,300mm91in | 2,300mm91in |
| Trunk volume | 185L | 185L |
| Max trunk volume | 610L | 610L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 35L | 35L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | 158g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
- Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet | Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.0 s | 36.8 s |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet | 165 hp 123 kW |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet | 160 hp 119 kW |
Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet has 5 hp more than Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet and Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet | 1,110 kg 2,447 lb |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet | 1,120 kg 2,469 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet | 7.3 s |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet | 7.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet and Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet | 583 km 362 mi |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet | 507 km 315 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet | 165 hp 123 kW | 7.3 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet | 160 hp 119 kW | 7.3 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Abarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet | Abarth595Facelift 2016Pista 1.4 T-Jet | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 165 hp 123 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,110 kg 2,447 lb | 1,120 kg 2,469 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 583 km 362 mi | 507 km 315 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | 158 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet | Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Abarth 695 XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 76 km (47 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 19 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 Pista 1.4 T-Jet
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























