Abarth 595 · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Abarth 595 · Facelift 2016 1.4 T-JetvsAbarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth 595C
1.4 T-Jet
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Most powerful160 hp119 kW
- Highest torque230 Nm170 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range547 km340 mi
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score90/100
Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,035 kg2,282 lb
- Largest trunk185 L
- Best overall score49/100
- Best practicality score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Abarth595Facelift 20161.4 T-Jet | Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 145hp108kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 206Nm152lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,035kg2,282lb | 1,085kg2,392lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,440kg3,175lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 74.8s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.6s Calculated | 47.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t104kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 530km330mi Calculated | 547km340mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 3,660mm144in | 3,657mm144in |
| Width | 1,627mm64in | 1,627mm64in |
| Height | 1,485mm58in | 1,488mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,300mm91in | 2,300mm91in |
| Front track | 1,415mm56in | 1,409mm55in |
| Rear track | 1,408mm55in | 1,402mm55in |
| Trunk volume | 185L | 182L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 520L |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 35L | 35L |
| CO2 emissions | 151g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
- Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 5,500 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Abarth595Facelift 20161.4 T-Jet | Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.6 s | 47.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 92 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 145 hp 108 kW |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 160 hp 119 kW |
Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet has 15 hp more than Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet and Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 206 Nm 152 lb-ft |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 1,035 kg 2,282 lb |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 1,085 kg 2,392 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 20161.4 T-Jet | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 7.8 s |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet and Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 530 km 330 mi |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 547 km 340 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 145 hp 108 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 160 hp 119 kW | 7.6 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 20161.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 20161.4 T-Jet |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth595Facelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Abarth595Facelift 20161.4 T-Jet | Abarth595C1.4 T-Jet | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 145 hp 108 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 206 Nm 152 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,035 kg 2,282 lb | 1,085 kg 2,392 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 530 km 330 mi | 547 km 340 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 151 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 182 L 6.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet | Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Abarth 595 Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Abarth 595C 1.4 T-Jet
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 24 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 17 km (10 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























