AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSIvsAbarth 124 Spider 1.4 MultiAir
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth 124 Spider
1.4 MultiAir
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
- Best estimated range873 km542 mi
- Best overall score50/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score43/100
Abarth 124 Spider 1.4 MultiAir
- Lightest1,060 kg2,337 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,555kg3,428lb | 1,060kg2,337lb |
| Gross weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | - |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.2s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 73.5s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.2s Calculated | 29.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 873km542mi Calculated | 682km424mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 4,423mm174in | 4,054mm160in |
| Width | 1,793mm71in | 1,740mm69in |
| Height | 1,409mm55in | 1,233mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,310mm91in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,496mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,503mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 245L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 645L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 45L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | 153g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Abarth 124 Spider 1.4 MultiAir: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 5,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.2 s | 29.6 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 170 hp 127 kW |
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI has 20 hp more than Abarth 124 Spider 1.4 MultiAir.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth 124 Spider 1.4 MultiAir and AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.9 s |
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 6.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 873 km 542 mi |
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 682 km 424 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.9 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 170 hp 127 kW | 6.9 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 873 km 542 mi | 682 km 424 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | 153 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 245 L 8.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI | Abarth 124 Spider 1.4 MultiAir |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 191 km (119 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Abarth 124 Spider 1.4 MultiAir
- Is 495 kg lighter
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























