Abarth 124 Spider
Car comparison
Abarth 124 Spider 1.4 MultiAirvsAbarth 595C · Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAbarth 595C · Facelift 2016
1.4 T-Jet
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Abarth 124 Spider 1.4 MultiAir
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lightest1,060 kg2,337 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best estimated range682 km424 mi
- Best overall score46/100
- Best performance score52/100
Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions134 g/km
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score43/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 145hp108kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 206Nm152lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,060kg2,337lb | 1,085kg2,392lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.5s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 80.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.6s Calculated | 49.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | 603km375mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,368cc83cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 4,054mm160in | 3,660mm144in |
| Width | 1,740mm69in | 1,627mm64in |
| Height | 1,233mm49in | 1,485mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,310mm91in | 2,300mm91in |
| Front track | 1,496mm59in | 1,415mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,503mm59in | 1,408mm55in |
| Trunk volume | - | 185L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 35L |
| CO2 emissions | 153g/km | 134g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Abarth 124 Spider 1.4 MultiAir: Power / Torque
- Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 5,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.6 s | 49.7 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 170 hp 127 kW |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 145 hp 108 kW |
Abarth 124 Spider 1.4 MultiAir has 25 hp more than Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet.
The biggest power difference is between Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet and Abarth 124 Spider 1.4 MultiAir: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 206 Nm 152 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 1,085 kg 2,392 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 6.9 s |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Abarth 124 Spider 1.4 MultiAir and Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet and Abarth 124 Spider 1.4 MultiAir: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 682 km 424 mi |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 603 km 375 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 170 hp 127 kW | 6.9 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 145 hp 108 kW | 8.0 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Abarth 124 Spider 1.4 MultiAir is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Abarth124 Spider1.4 MultiAir | Abarth595CFacelift 20161.4 T-Jet | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 145 hp 108 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 206 Nm 152 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb | 1,085 kg 2,392 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | 603 km 375 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 153 g/km | 134 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Abarth 124 Spider 1.4 MultiAir | Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Abarth 124 Spider 1.4 MultiAir
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 44 Nm more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 78 km (49 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Abarth 595C Facelift 2016 1.4 T-Jet
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 19 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























