Images may not match the exact vehicle variant.
360 hp1999 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2018
0-100 km/h 6.1 s
Top speed
282 km/h
175 mph
Performance
| Power | 240 hp / Stage 3: 360 hp340 hp / Stage 3: 483 hp470 hp / Stage 3: 667 hp510 hp / Stage 3: 724 hp550 hp / Stage 3: 781 hp575 hp / Stage 3: 816 hp |
|---|---|
| Torque | 527Nm389lb-ft+187 Nm |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Curb weight | 1,735kg3,825lb |
| Power-to-weight | 207hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s-1.8 s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.8s-10.8 s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s-1.7 s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s-1.7 s Calculated |
| Top speed | 282 km/h 175 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.1s99% target: 279 km/h / 173 mph-11.0 s Calculated |
Efficiency and range
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
|---|---|
| Fuel tank | 80L |
| Estimated range | 952km592mi Calculated |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km |
Engine and drivetrain
Dimensions and space
| Length | 5,130mm202in |
|---|---|
| Width | 1,899mm75in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in |
| Doors | 4 |
| Seats | 5 |
Performance spider chart
Current vehicle compared with the precomputed median score across the database.
Power benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 (Stage 3) | 360 hp 268 kW |
| Database median | 262 hp 195 kW |
0-100 km/h benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · s
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 (Stage 3) | 6.1 s |
| Database median | 6.4 s |
Top speed benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Top speed. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 (Stage 3) | 282 km/h 175 mph |
| Database median | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Fuel consumption benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 (Stage 3) | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| Database median | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 (Stage 3) |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year |
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 (Stage 3)PowerTorque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 (Stage 3): Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 (Stage 3) | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XJ (X351) 2.0
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected
Popular comparisons
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ Sovereign (X358)4.2 V8
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsFordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245