Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 · Stage 3vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 · Stage 2vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 · Stage 1vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 T5 (Stage 2)
Volvo XC60 II
2.0 T5 (Stage 1)
Volvo XC60 II
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful375 hp280 kW
- Highest torque543 Nm400 lb-ft
- Lightest1,927 kg4,248 lb
- Best power-to-weight195 hp/t145 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions169 g/km
- Best estimated range822 km511 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 375hp280kW+125 hp | 325hp242kW+75 hp | 295hp220kW+45 hp | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 543Nm400lb-ft+193 Nm | 473Nm348lb-ft+123 Nm | 427Nm315lb-ft+77 Nm | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,927kg4,248lb | 1,927kg4,248lb | 1,927kg4,248lb | 1,927kg4,248lb |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.5s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph-14.6 s Calculated | 66.7s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph-9.4 s Calculated | 69.7s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph-6.4 s Calculated | 76.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s-1.6 s | 5.9s-1.0 s | 6.2s-0.7 s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.8s-15.4 s Calculated | 23.9s-11.3 s Calculated | 27.5s-7.6 s Calculated | 35.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s-1.4 s Calculated | 5.6s-1.0 s Calculated | 5.9s-0.6 s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s-1.5 s Calculated | 14.0s-0.9 s Calculated | 14.4s-0.6 s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 195hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 282Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 822km511mi Calculated | 822km511mi Calculated | 822km511mi Calculated | 822km511mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | 1,668mm66in | 1,668mm66in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | 216mm9in | 216mm9in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 505L | 505L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | 1,432L | 1,432L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 169g/km | 169g/km | 169g/km | 169g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 2) 325 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 1) 295 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 250 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.6 s | 5.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.9 s | 6.2 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.8 s | 23.9 s | 27.5 s | 35.2 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.1 s | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.2 s | 9.4 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.8 s | 12.1 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 14.0 s | 14.4 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 375 hp 280 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 325 hp 242 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 250 hp 186 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp has 125 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 250 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 250 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp: 125 hp (93 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 473 Nm 348 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 5.4 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 5.9 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 6.2 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 250 hp: 1.6 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 2) 325 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 1) 295 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 822 km 511 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 822 km 511 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 822 km 511 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 822 km 511 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 375 hp 280 kW | 5.4 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 325 hp 242 kW | 5.9 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW | 6.2 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 3)375 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 2)325 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 (Stage 1)295 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5250 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 375 hp 280 kW | 325 hp 242 kW | 295 hp 220 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft | 473 Nm 348 lb-ft | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.9 s | 6.2 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb | 1,927 kg 4,248 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 822 km 511 mi | 822 km 511 mi | 822 km 511 mi | 822 km 511 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 169 g/km | 169 g/km | 169 g/km | 169 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 2) 325 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 1) 295 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 250 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 3) 375 hp
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 (Stage 2) 325 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























