Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 · Stage 3vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 · Stage 2vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 · Stage 1vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D4 (Stage 2)
Volvo XC60 II
2.0 D4 (Stage 1)
Volvo XC60 II
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 295 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful295 hp220 kW
- Highest torque640 Nm472 lb-ft
- Lightest1,985 kg4,376 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions145 g/km
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 295hp220kW+105 hp | 257hp191kW+67 hp | 228hp170kW+38 hp | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 640Nm472lb-ft+240 Nm | 560Nm413lb-ft+160 Nm | 500Nm369lb-ft+100 Nm | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,985kg4,376lb | 1,985kg4,376lb | 1,985kg4,376lb | 1,985kg4,376lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.9s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph-10.0 s Calculated | 88.2s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph-4.7 s Calculated | 92.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph-0.5 s Calculated | 93.0s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s-2.1 s | 7.3s-1.5 s | 7.9s-1.0 s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.8s-44.7 s Calculated | 32.4s-39.0 s Calculated | 38.8s-32.7 s Calculated | 71.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s-1.9 s Calculated | 6.9s-1.4 s Calculated | 7.4s-0.9 s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s-1.7 s Calculated | 15.2s-1.1 s Calculated | 15.7s-0.7 s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 96hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 322Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | 1,668mm66in | 1,668mm66in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | 216mm9in | 216mm9in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 505L | 505L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | 1,432L | 1,432L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 145g/km | 145g/km | 145g/km | 145g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 295 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 2) 257 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 1) 228 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 190 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.9 s | 7.4 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.3 s | 7.9 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.8 s | 32.4 s | 38.8 s | 71.5 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.9 s | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.8 s | 13.2 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.2 s | 15.7 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 257 hp 191 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 228 hp 170 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 295 hp has 105 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 190 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 190 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 295 hp: 105 hp (78 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 6.7 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 7.3 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 7.9 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 295 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 190 hp: 2.1 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 2) 257 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 1) 228 hp, separated by only 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW | 6.7 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 257 hp 191 kW | 7.3 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 228 hp 170 kW | 7.9 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.8 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 295 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 295 hp 220 kW | 257 hp 191 kW | 228 hp 170 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.3 s | 7.9 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 145 g/km | 145 g/km | 145 g/km | 145 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 295 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 2) 257 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 1) 228 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 295 hp
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 2) 257 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























