Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 · Stage 3vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 · Stage 2vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 · Stage 1vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D4 (Stage 2)
Volvo XC60 II
2.0 D4 (Stage 1)
Volvo XC60 II
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 295 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful295 hp220 kW
- Highest torque640 Nm472 lb-ft
- Lightest1,846 kg4,070 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions135 g/km
- Best estimated range1,078 km670 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 295hp220kW+105 hp | 257hp191kW+67 hp | 228hp170kW+38 hp | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 640Nm472lb-ft+240 Nm | 560Nm413lb-ft+160 Nm | 500Nm369lb-ft+100 Nm | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,846kg4,070lb | 1,846kg4,070lb | 1,846kg4,070lb | 1,846kg4,070lb |
| Gross weight | 2,370kg5,225lb | 2,370kg5,225lb | 2,370kg5,225lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.1s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph-10.5 s Calculated | 84.9s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph-5.7 s Calculated | 88.5s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph-2.1 s Calculated | 90.6s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s-2.1 s | 7.3s-1.5 s | 7.9s-1.0 s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.3s-43.6 s Calculated | 32.1s-37.8 s Calculated | 39.1s-30.8 s Calculated | 69.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s-1.9 s Calculated | 6.9s-1.4 s Calculated | 7.4s-0.9 s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s-1.7 s Calculated | 15.2s-1.1 s Calculated | 15.7s-0.7 s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 347Nm/t232lb-ft/ton Calculated | 303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,078km670mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | 216mm9in | 216mm9in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 505L | 505L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | 1,432L | 1,432L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 135g/km | 135g/km | 135g/km | 135g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 295 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 2) 257 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 1) 228 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 190 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.9 s | 7.4 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.3 s | 7.9 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.3 s | 32.1 s | 39.1 s | 69.9 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.0 s | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.8 s | 13.2 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.2 s | 15.7 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 257 hp 191 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 228 hp 170 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 295 hp has 105 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 190 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 190 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 295 hp: 105 hp (78 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 1,846 kg 4,070 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 1,846 kg 4,070 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 1,846 kg 4,070 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 1,846 kg 4,070 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 6.7 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 7.3 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 7.9 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 295 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 190 hp: 2.1 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 2) 257 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 1) 228 hp, separated by only 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 1,078 km 670 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 1,078 km 670 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 1,078 km 670 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW | 6.7 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 257 hp 191 kW | 7.3 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 228 hp 170 kW | 7.9 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.8 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 295 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 3)295 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 2)257 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 (Stage 1)228 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4190 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 295 hp 220 kW | 257 hp 191 kW | 228 hp 170 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.3 s | 7.9 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,846 kg 4,070 lb | 1,846 kg 4,070 lb | 1,846 kg 4,070 lb | 1,846 kg 4,070 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,078 km 670 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 135 g/km | 135 g/km | 135 g/km | 135 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 295 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 2) 257 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 1) 228 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 3) 295 hp
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 (Stage 2) 257 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























