Volvo V70 II · Facelift 2004
Car comparison
Volvo V70 II · Facelift 2004 2.5TvsVolvo XC70 II 3.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC70 II
3.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,595 kg3,516 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range761 km473 mi
- Best economy score82/100
Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6
- Most powerful285 hp213 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 285hp213kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,769kg3,900lb |
| Gross weight | 2,130kg4,696lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 76.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 69.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.3s Calculated | 34.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 761km473mi Calculated | 609km378mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,953cc180cu in |
| Length | 4,710mm185in | 4,838mm190in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,861mm73in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,604mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,755mm108in | 2,815mm111in |
| Front track | 1,551mm61in | 1,614mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,548mm61in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 210mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 485L | 575L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,641L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 269g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 5,950 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 6,200 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.3 s | 34.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 285 hp 213 kW |
Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 has 75 hp more than Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T and Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: 75 hp (56 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 1,769 kg 3,900 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 7.4 s |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 7.6 s |
Although Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 has more power, Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T and Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T and Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 761 km 473 mi |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 609 km 378 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 285 hp 213 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 285 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,769 kg 3,900 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 761 km 473 mi | 609 km 378 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 269 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T | Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Is 174 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 152 km (95 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6
- Has 75 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























