Volvo V50 · Facelift 2007
Car comparison
Volvo V50 · Facelift 2007 2.5 T5vsVolvo V70 III 3.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V70 III
3.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,406 kg3,100 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions208 g/km
- Best estimated range713 km443 mi
- Best economy score83/100
Volvo V70 III 3.0 T6
- Most powerful304 hp227 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight164 hp/t122 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | VolvoV70 III3.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 304hp227kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,406kg3,100lb | 1,852kg4,083lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 2,410kg5,313lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 74.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.0s Calculated | 23.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 713km443mi Calculated | 686km426mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,953cc180cu in |
| Length | 4,522mm178in | 4,823mm190in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,861mm73in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,547mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,816mm111in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,586mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 151mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 417L | 575L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,307L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 208g/km | 237g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo V70 III 3.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoV70 III3.0 T6 | 5,600 rpm | 2,100-4,200 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | VolvoV70 III3.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.0 s | 23.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW |
| VolvoV70 III3.0 T6 | 304 hp 227 kW |
Volvo V70 III 3.0 T6 has 74 hp more than Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 and Volvo V70 III 3.0 T6: 74 hp (55 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoV70 III3.0 T6 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 1,406 kg 3,100 lb |
| VolvoV70 III3.0 T6 | 1,852 kg 4,083 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoV70 III3.0 T6 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 6.9 s |
| VolvoV70 III3.0 T6 | 6.9 s |
Although Volvo V70 III 3.0 T6 has more power, Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoV70 III3.0 T6 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 and Volvo V70 III 3.0 T6: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoV70 III3.0 T6 | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 713 km 443 mi |
| VolvoV70 III3.0 T6 | 686 km 426 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoV70 III3.0 T6 | 304 hp 227 kW | 6.9 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV70 III3.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV70 III3.0 T6 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V70 III 3.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| VolvoV70 III3.0 T6 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoV70 III3.0 T6 | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | VolvoV70 III3.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 304 hp 227 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,406 kg 3,100 lb | 1,852 kg 4,083 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 713 km 443 mi | 686 km 426 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 208 g/km | 237 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 | Volvo V70 III 3.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.22 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,284 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Is 446 kg lighter
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 26 km (16 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 29 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volvo V70 III 3.0 T6
- Has 74 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 158 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























