Volvo V50
Car comparison
Volvo V50 2.5 T5vsVolvo V70 III 3.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V70 III
3.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V70 III 3.2
- Most powerful243 hp181 kW
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions214 g/km
- Best estimated range761 km473 mi
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Volvo V50 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV502.5 T5 | VolvoV70 III3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 243hp181kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,567kg3,455lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,180kg4,806lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 83.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.3s Calculated | 32.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km353mi Calculated | 761km473mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 3,192cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,514mm178in | 4,823mm190in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,907mm75in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,547mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,816mm111in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,586mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 151mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 417L | 575L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,307L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 243g/km | 214g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V50 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo V70 III 3.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 6,400 rpm | 3,180 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV502.5 T5 | VolvoV70 III3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.3 s | 32.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 243 hp 181 kW |
Volvo V70 III 3.2 has 23 hp more than Volvo V50 2.5 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V50 2.5 T5 and Volvo V70 III 3.2: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 7.6 s |
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 8.4 s |
Although Volvo V70 III 3.2 has more power, Volvo V50 2.5 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V50 2.5 T5 and Volvo V70 III 3.2: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V70 III 3.2 and Volvo V50 2.5 T5: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 569 km 353 mi |
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 761 km 473 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 243 hp 181 kW | 8.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV70 III3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV70 III3.2 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V70 III 3.2 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV502.5 T5 | VolvoV70 III3.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 243 hp 181 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 353 mi | 761 km 473 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 243 g/km | 214 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V50 2.5 T5 | Volvo V70 III 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V50 2.5 T5
- Is 72 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo V70 III 3.2
- Has 23 hp more
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 192 km (119 mi) more estimated range
- Has 158 L more trunk volume
- Emits 29 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























