Volvo V70 II · Facelift 2004
Car comparison
Volvo V70 II · Facelift 2004 2.5TvsVolvo V50 · Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V50 · Facelift 2007
2.5 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range761 km473 mi
- Largest trunk485 L
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 2,130kg4,696lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 67.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.3s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 761km473mi Calculated | 653km406mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,710mm185in | 4,522mm178in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,755mm108in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,551mm61in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,548mm61in | 1,531mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 485L | 417L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,641L | 1,307L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 227g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: Power / Torque
- Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.3 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW |
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 has 20 hp more than Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T and Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 7.4 s |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 and Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 761 km 473 mi |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 653 km 406 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 761 km 473 mi | 653 km 406 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 227 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T | Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 16.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,494 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 108 km (67 mi) more estimated range
- Has 68 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 165 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























