Volvo V40 Cross Country · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Volvo V40 Cross Country · Facelift 2016 2.0 T4vsVolvo XC40 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC40
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC40 2.0 D4
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions133 g/km
- Best estimated range1,059 km658 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,568 kg3,457 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | VolvoXC402.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,568kg3,457lb | 1,728kg3,810lb |
| Gross weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 84.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.8s Calculated | 51.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 891km553mi Calculated | 1,059km658mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,370mm172in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,783mm70in | 1,863mm73in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,646mm104in | 2,702mm106in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,626mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | 211mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 324L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | 1,336L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 54L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | 133g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC40 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | VolvoXC402.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.8 s | 51.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 1,568 kg 3,457 lb |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 1,728 kg 3,810 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 7.4 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T4 and Volvo XC40 2.0 D4: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 D4 and Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T4: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 891 km 553 mi |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 1,059 km 658 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 T4 | VolvoXC402.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,568 kg 3,457 lb | 1,728 kg 3,810 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 891 km 553 mi | 1,059 km 658 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | 133 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 324 L 11.4 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T4 | Volvo XC40 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 T4
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC40 2.0 D4
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 168 km (105 mi) more estimated range
- Has 136 L more trunk volume
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























