Volvo S60 II
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5vsVolvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 Cross Country
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,436 km892 mi
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score94/100
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Lightest1,569 kg3,459 lb
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 215hp160kW | 213hp159kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,583kg3,490lb | 1,569kg3,459lb |
| Gross weight | 2,090kg4,608lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 80.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.1s Calculated | 33.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 265Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,436km892mi Calculated | 760km472mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,400cc146cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,628mm182in | 4,370mm172in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,857mm73in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,646mm104in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,540mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 335L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 57L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 174g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 6,000 rpm | 2,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.1 s | 33.4 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 213 hp 159 kW |
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has 2 hp more than Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,583 kg 3,490 lb |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 1,569 kg 3,459 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 7.4 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 6.9 s |
Although Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has more power, Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,436 km 892 mi |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 760 km 472 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 213 hp 159 kW | 6.9 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 215 hp 160 kW | 213 hp 159 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,583 kg 3,490 lb | 1,569 kg 3,459 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,436 km 892 mi | 760 km 472 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 174 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 | Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 676 km (420 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
- Is 14 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























