Volvo S60 II
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5vsVolvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 Cross Country
1.6 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t95 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score54/100
Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4
- Lightest1,476 kg3,254 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,127 km700 mi
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 215hp160kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,476kg3,254lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 1,910kg4,211lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 85.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.1s Calculated | 44.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,071km666mi Calculated | 1,127km700mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,400cc146cu in | 1,596cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,628mm182in | 4,370mm172in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,857mm73in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,646mm104in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,540mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 335L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 5,700 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.1 s | 44.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 97 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW |
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has 35 hp more than Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4 and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 1,476 kg 3,254 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 7.6 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 and Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4 and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,071 km 666 mi |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 1,127 km 700 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.7 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 215 hp 160 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | 1,476 kg 3,254 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,071 km 666 mi | 1,127 km 700 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 | Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4
- Is 209 kg lighter
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 56 km (35 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























