Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 · Stage 3vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 · Stage 2vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 · Stage 1vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 T6 (Stage 2)
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 T6 (Stage 1)
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 459 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed269 km/h167 mph
- Most powerful459 hp342 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lightest1,609 kg3,547 lb
- Best power-to-weight285 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,055 km655 mi
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 3)459 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 2)398 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 1)361 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6306 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 459hp342kW+153 hp | 398hp297kW+92 hp | 361hp269kW+55 hp | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft+220 Nm | 540Nm398lb-ft+140 Nm | 488Nm360lb-ft+88 Nm | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,609kg3,547lb | 1,609kg3,547lb | 1,609kg3,547lb | 1,609kg3,547lb |
| Gross weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 41.2s99% target: 266 km/h / 165 mph-12.4 s Calculated | 45.0s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph-8.6 s Calculated | 47.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph-6.0 s Calculated | 53.6s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s-1.3 s | 5.0s-0.9 s | 5.3s-0.6 s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.8s-6.6 s Calculated | 14.9s-4.5 s Calculated | 16.6s-2.8 s Calculated | 19.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s-1.2 s Calculated | 4.8s-0.8 s Calculated | 5.1s-0.5 s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s-1.5 s Calculated | 12.9s-1.0 s Calculated | 13.3s-0.6 s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 285hp/t213kW/t129hp/1000 lb Calculated | 247hp/t184kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated | 224hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 190hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 385Nm/t258lb-ft/ton Calculated | 336Nm/t225lb-ft/ton Calculated | 303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 249Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,055km655mi Calculated | 1,055km655mi Calculated | 1,055km655mi Calculated | 1,055km655mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,635mm182in | 4,635mm182in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,484mm58in | 1,484mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,776mm109in | 2,776mm109in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,578mm62in | 1,578mm62in | 1,578mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,575mm62in | 1,575mm62in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | 136mm5in | 136mm5in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 380L | 380L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 68L | 68L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 459 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 (Stage 2) 398 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 (Stage 1) 361 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 306 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 3)459 hp | 5,700 rpm | 2,100-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 2)398 hp | 5,700 rpm | 2,100-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 1)361 hp | 5,700 rpm | 2,100-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6306 hp | 5,700 rpm | 2,100-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 3)459 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 2)398 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 1)361 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6306 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.8 s | 5.1 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.8 s | 14.9 s | 16.6 s | 19.4 s |
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s | 6.0 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.6 s | 8.9 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 11.0 s | 11.3 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.9 s | 13.3 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 122 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph | 181 km/h 112 mph | 173 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 3)459 hp | 459 hp 342 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 2)398 hp | 398 hp 297 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 1)361 hp | 361 hp 269 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6306 hp | 306 hp 228 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 459 hp has 153 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 306 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 306 hp and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 459 hp: 153 hp (114 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 3)459 hp | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 2)398 hp | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 1)361 hp | 488 Nm 360 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6306 hp | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 3)459 hp | 1,609 kg 3,547 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 2)398 hp | 1,609 kg 3,547 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 1)361 hp | 1,609 kg 3,547 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6306 hp | 1,609 kg 3,547 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 3)459 hp | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 2)398 hp | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 1)361 hp | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6306 hp | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 3)459 hp | 4.6 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 2)398 hp | 5.0 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 1)361 hp | 5.3 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6306 hp | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 459 hp and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 306 hp: 1.3 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 (Stage 2) 398 hp and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 (Stage 1) 361 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 3)459 hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 2)398 hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 1)361 hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6306 hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 3)459 hp | 285 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 2)398 hp | 247 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 1)361 hp | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6306 hp | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 3)459 hp | 1,055 km 655 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 2)398 hp | 1,055 km 655 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 1)361 hp | 1,055 km 655 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6306 hp | 1,055 km 655 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 3)459 hp | 459 hp 342 kW | 4.6 s | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 2)398 hp | 398 hp 297 kW | 5.0 s | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 1)361 hp | 361 hp 269 kW | 5.3 s | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6306 hp | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 3)459 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 2)398 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 1)361 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6306 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 3)459 hp |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 2)398 hp |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 1)361 hp |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6306 hp |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 459 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 3)459 hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 2)398 hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 1)361 hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6306 hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 3)459 hp | 285 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 2)398 hp | 247 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 1)361 hp | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6306 hp | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 3)459 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 2)398 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 (Stage 1)361 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6306 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 459 hp 342 kW | 398 hp 297 kW | 361 hp 269 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 488 Nm 360 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,609 kg 3,547 lb | 1,609 kg 3,547 lb | 1,609 kg 3,547 lb | 1,609 kg 3,547 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,055 km 655 mi | 1,055 km 655 mi | 1,055 km 655 mi | 1,055 km 655 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 285 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 247 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 459 hp | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 (Stage 2) 398 hp | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 (Stage 1) 361 hp | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 306 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 459 hp
- Has 61 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 (Stage 2) 398 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























