Volvo S60
Car comparison
Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20VvsVolvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S40 II
2.5 20V T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lightest1,537 kg3,389 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk424 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Lowest city consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,537kg3,389lb | 1,545kg3,406lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 63.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.9s Calculated | 23.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 611km379mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,319cc142cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,576mm180in | 4,476mm176in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,428mm56in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,531mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 424L | 404L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,034L | 883L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 227g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V: Power / Torque
- Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 5,200 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.9 s | 23.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 250 hp 186 kW |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V has 30 hp more than Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5 and Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 1,537 kg 3,389 lb |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 7.1 s |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 6.8 s |
Although Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V has more power, Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5 and Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS602.3 T5 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS602.3 T5 20V | VolvoS40 II2.5 20V T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,537 kg 3,389 lb | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 611 km 379 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 227 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 424 L 15.0 cu ft | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,494 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 2.3 T5 20V
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 8 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Volvo S40 II 2.5 20V T5
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























