Volkswagen Touareg III (CR)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan II
2.0 BiTDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,720 kg3,792 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range938 km583 mi
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score90/100
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Largest trunk810 L
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,029kg4,473lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.8s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 68.0s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.4s Calculated | 28.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 938km583mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,878mm192in | 4,486mm177in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,717mm68in | 1,673mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,899mm114in | 2,677mm105in |
| Front track | 1,669mm66in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,685mm66in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 810L | 615L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,800L | 1,655L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 167g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.4 s | 28.0 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 252 hp 188 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW |
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI has 12 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 2,029 kg 4,473 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 6.5 s |
Although Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI has more power, Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 833 km 518 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 938 km 583 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 252 hp 188 kW | 6.8 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,029 kg 4,473 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 938 km 583 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 167 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 810 L 28.6 cu ft | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 195 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 309 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 104 km (65 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























