Volvo V40 Cross Country · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Volvo V40 Cross Country · Facelift 2016 2.0 D3vsVolkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Taigo
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 D3
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,550 km963 mi
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score96/100
Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Lightest1,229 kg2,709 lb
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,229kg2,709lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 101.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 85.2s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 45.6s Calculated | 48.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 100hp/t75kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,550km963mi Calculated | 784km487mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,370mm172in | 4,266mm168in |
| Width | 1,783mm70in | 1,757mm69in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,515mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,646mm104in | 2,554mm101in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | 1,531mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,516mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 324L | 440L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | 1,222L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 105g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 D3: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 3,750 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 45.6 s | 48.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 1,229 kg 2,709 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 8.5 s |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI and Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 D3: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 and Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 100 hp/t 75 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 1,550 km 963 mi |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 784 km 487 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.3 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 |
| 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 100 hp/t 75 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | VolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,229 kg 2,709 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,550 km 963 mi | 784 km 487 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 105 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 324 L 11.4 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 100 hp/t 75 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 | Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.00 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.27 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 600 L159 US gal132 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,050 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 D3
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 766 km (476 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Taigo 1.5 TSI
- Is 271 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 116 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























