Volkswagen T-Roc I
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan III
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed216 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption0.4 L/100 km588.0 mpg US706.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range11,250 km6,990 mi
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best economy score100/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,420kg3,131lb | 1,815kg4,001lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 72.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.7s Calculated | 38.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 0.4L/100 km588mpg US706.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 98hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 138Nm/t92lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 809km503mi Calculated | 11,250km6,990mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,234mm167in | 4,539mm179in |
| Width | 1,819mm72in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,573mm62in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,590mm102in | 2,679mm105in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | 1,583mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 161mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 490L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,290L | 1,486L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | - | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.7 s | 38.3 s |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW |
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI has 13 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 7.0 s |
Although Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI has more power, Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 0.4 L/100 km 588.0 mpg US 706.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: 6.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 809 km 503 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 11,250 km 6,990 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.0 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI |
| 0.4 L/100 km 588.0 mpg US 706.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 0.4 L/100 km 588.0 mpg US 706.2 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 0.4 L/100 km 588.0 mpg US 706.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 0.4 L/100 km 588.0 mpg US 706.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 809 km 503 mi | 11,250 km 6,990 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 0.4 L/100 km588 mpg US706.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 0.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 1.13 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 60 L16 US gal13 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 105.00 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 395 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSI
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 6.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10,441 km (6,488 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























