Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range809 km503 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,420kg3,131lb |
| Gross weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.4s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 67.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.0s Calculated | 35.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 789km491mi Calculated | 809km503mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 4,234mm167in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,573mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,590mm102in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,541mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 161mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | 1,290L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 174g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 4,500 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.0 s | 35.7 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI has 40 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 6.3 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 789 km 491 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 809 km 503 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.3 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 789 km 491 mi | 809 km 503 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 174 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 170 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
- Is 215 kg lighter
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 km (12 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























