Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI 2017-2018
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,078 km670 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI 2022-2025
- Fastest top speed201 km/h125 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,486 kg3,276 lb
- Best power-to-weight101 hp/t75 kW/t9.9 kg/hp
- Best performance score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI2022-2025 | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI2017-2018 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,486kg3,276lb | 1,530kg3,373lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | 201 km/h 125 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.0s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated | 75.0s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 90.5s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 98hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 982km610mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,236mm167in | 4,234mm167in |
| Width | 1,819mm72in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,582mm62in | 1,573mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,594mm102in | 2,593mm102in |
| Front track | 1,547mm61in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,552mm61in | 1,547mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 392L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,237L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 134g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI 2022-2025: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI 2017-2018: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI2022-2025 | 3,500 rpm | 1,600-2,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI2017-2018 | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI2022-2025 | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI2017-2018 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 90.5 s | - |
| Top speed | 201 km/h 125 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI2022-2025 | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI2017-2018 | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI2022-2025 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI2017-2018 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI2022-2025 | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI2017-2018 | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI2022-2025 | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI2017-2018 | 200 km/h 124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI2022-2025 | 8.6 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI2017-2018 | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI 2017-2018 and Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI 2022-2025: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI2022-2025 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI2017-2018 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI 2017-2018 and Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI 2022-2025: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI2022-2025 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI2017-2018 | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI2022-2025 | 982 km 610 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI2017-2018 | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI2022-2025 | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI2017-2018 | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.4 s | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI2022-2025 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI2017-2018 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI2022-2025 |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI2017-2018 |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI 2017-2018 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI2022-2025 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI2017-2018 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI2022-2025 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI2017-2018 | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI2022-2025 | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI2017-2018 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 201 km/h 125 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 982 km 610 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 134 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 392 L 13.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI 2022-2025 | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI 2017-2018 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI 2022-2025
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 44 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI 2017-2018
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 96 km (60 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























